AMC 10 · 2024 · #15

Grade 6 arithmetic
mean-median-mode-rangesystematic-enumerationinterval-arithmetic caseworksystematic-enumerationidentify-subproblems ↑ Prerequisites: mean-median-mode-rangefraction-decimal-conversion
📏 Long solution 💡 3 insights
Problem
A list of 9 real numbers contains the six fixed values 1, 2.2, 3.2, 5.2, 6.2, 7 together with three more reals x ≤ y ≤ z. The range of the list is 7, and both the mean and the median are positive integers. Count the number of ordered triples (x, y, z) that work.

Pick an answer.

(A)
1
(B)
2
(C)
3
(D)
4
(E)
$text{infinitely many}$

AMC 10 2024 problem © Mathematical Association of America (MAA AMC). Reproduced for educational use.

How to solve
Strategy Identify Subproblems

There are three independent conditions — range, mean-integer, median-integer — and four ways the min/max of the list can fall on {1, 7} versus {x, z}. Tool #7 (Identify Subproblems) makes the casework explicit by partitioning on "who is min, who is max". Tool #2 (Systematic List) then walks the three live cases (the fourth, min = 1, max = 7, has range 6 and is killed instantly). Within each case, the mean-integer condition pins x + y + z mod 1 to .2, the range condition pins one of x, z, and the median-integer condition pins the remaining free coordinate. Tool #3 (Eliminate Possibilities) does the final filtering — once we have a candidate, plug back and check all four conditions; tossing the ones that fail.

1STEP 1

The six fixed numbers sum to 24.8, so an integer mean makes x + y + z ∈ {2.2, 11.2, 20.2, …}, and the range forces x ≥ 0.

x + y + z = 9M - 24.8, M ∈ Z_ > 0, x ≥ 0
2STEP 2

Split by who is min and max. Since min = 1 & max = 7 gives range 6, drop it; the three live cases give z = 8, or x = 0, or z = x + 7.

Case I: z=8; Case II: x=0; Case III: z=x+7, 0 ≤ x < 1
3STEP 3

Case I (z = 8): x + y = 3.2 puts the median at 3.2 (not integer), so drop it; x + y = 12.2 survives with 4.2 ≤ x ≤ 6.1.

Case I sub-case: x+y=12.2, 4.2 ≤ x ≤ 6.1
4STEP 4

Pushing the median through the sorted list, only x = 6 works (median 6), giving the valid triple (6, 6.2, 8) with mean 5.

(x, y, z) = (6, 6.2, 8) — valid
5STEP 5

Case II (x = 0): y + z = 2.2 fails on the median; y + z = 11.2 forces integer y = 5, so z = 6.2 — valid triple (0, 5, 6.2), mean 4.

(x, y, z) = (0, 5, 6.2) — valid
6STEP 6

Case III (z = x + 7): the median forces integer y ∈ {4, 5}. y = 4 gives x = 0.1, z = 7.1; y = 5 forces x out of [0, 1) — no solution.

y=4 → x=0.1, z=7.1; y=5 → no solution
7STEP 7

Case III's (0.1, 4, 7.1) checks out (median 4, mean 4, range 7). Across all cases there are 3 valid triples — answer (C).

(x, y, z) ∈ {(6, 6.2, 8), (0, 5, 6.2), (0.1, 4, 7.1)} → (C)
Answer
3
The three triples each correspond to a different structural way the range 7 can be realized — one with the new max at z = 8, one with the new min at x = 0, one with both endpoints fresh (x = 0.1, z = 7.1). That symmetry is a strong sign the casework is exhaustive. Also, each verified triple lands on a different mean (5, 4, 4) and a different median (6, 5, 4), reinforcing that they are genuinely distinct. The answer (C) = 3 matches.
💡Key takeaway

This AMC 10 problem only needs Grade 6 "mean / median / range" definitions plus careful case-by-case checking that you already know!