AMC 10 · 2011 · #25
Grade 7 probabilitynumber-theoryPick an answer.
Tool #15 (Organize Information in More Ways): rounding is hard to compute with, but the same information can be stored as a leftover instead. Writing m=k[m/k]+s(m), where s(m) is the remainder measured from the nearest multiple of k, turns the rounding equation into the exact statement s(n)+s(100-n)=s(100) with no rounding left in it. Tool #9 (Solve an Easier Related Problem): the range 1 ≤ n ≤ 99! is unusable directly, but the event only depends on n modulo k, so the question shrinks to counting good remainders among k of them. Tool #4 (Introduce a Variable): naming c=s(100) and h=(k-1)/2 turns the count into the length of an overlap of two intervals. Tool #14 (Extreme Principle): the question asks for a minimum, so I need a bound on P(k) and a k that sits exactly on it. Tool #7 (Identify Subproblems): the bound settles all small k at once but goes slack for large k, so those must be computed exactly in a separate case.
Rounding never ties
An odd divisor makes a rounding tie impossible.
An odd number of equal parts can never split a whole into two exact halves, so nothing ever lands on the fence.
4.OA.B.4Introduce A VariableOnly the remainder of n matters
Only the remainder of the pick matters.
Moving n by a whole k lifts one rounded piece by one step and drops the other by one step, so the total is unchanged.
Moving the number by a whole step lifts one rounded piece by one and drops the other by one, so the total is unchanged.
▸ Why?
What one piece gains the other loses, so the total never moves and only the split does.
▸ Why?
Only the leftover after dividing by that step can affect the rounding, so nothing else matters.
Why the problem says 99!
The huge range makes every remainder equally likely.
When the range of a random pick is an exact multiple of k, every remainder is equally likely.
7.SP.C.7Solve An Easier Related ProblemStore the remainder as a leftover
Storing a signed leftover replaces the rounding.
Rounding to the nearest multiple of k is the same as discarding the leftover that is closer to zero than to ± k.
7.NS.A.1Organize Information In More WaysThe rounding disappears
The rounding then disappears from the identity.
Rounding hides the leftovers, so writing the leftovers out in the open turns the puzzle into plain algebra.
6.EE.A.3Organize Information In More WaysWhen the leftovers add exactly
What remains is one size condition.
The two leftovers add correctly only when their sum does not spill out of the window and get yanked back by a whole k.
6.NS.C.7Organize Information In More WaysCount the good remainders
Counting good remainders gives a clean formula.
Sliding the window of good leftovers by c pushes exactly |c| of the k remainders off the end.
6.EE.B.8Introduce A VariableA floor, and when it is touched
That formula has a floor touched only rarely.
A floor is only a promise; it becomes a real value only at the rare k for which 100 sits almost exactly halfway between two multiples of k.
4.OA.B.4Extreme PrincipleTwo cases finish the job
Two ranges are checked separately.
Small k are protected by the floor, while large k have to be checked by hand precisely because the floor there is too weak to help.
4.NF.A.2Identify SubproblemsThe minimum is reached at k = 67
The smallest is 34/67, choice (D).
A minimum needs two things: a floor nobody breaks, and one case that sits right on it.
6.EE.B.5Extreme PrincipleRounding to the nearest multiple of k just throws away the leftover nearest zero, so the whole question collapses to one thing: how far is 100 from the closest multiple of k?
- Rounding never ties
- Only the remainder of n matters
- Why the problem says 99!
- Store the remainder as a leftover
- The rounding disappears
- When the leftovers add exactly
- Count the good remainders
- A floor, and when it is touched
- Two cases finish the job
- The minimum is reached at k = 67