AMC 10 · 2012 · #8

Grade 6 counting
weighted-averagesequences-geometricoptimization extremal-constructionconvert-to-algebra ↑ Prerequisites: fraction-arithmeticmean-median-mode-range
📏 Medium solution 💡 3 insights
Problem
Numbers are averaged one at a time down a chosen order. Find the spread of possible results.

Pick an answer.

(A)
$\frac{31}{16}$
(B)
2
(C)
$\frac{17}{8}$
(D)
3
(E)
$\frac{65}{16}$
How to solve
Strategy Extreme Principle

The question asks for a largest and a smallest value, so this is a max/min problem — Tool #14 (Extreme Principle) is the spine. But you cannot compare orderings until you know how much each slot actually counts. So first use Tool #4 (Introduce a Variable): call the chosen order a,b,c,d,e and write the chain of averages. Then Tool #5 (Look for a Pattern): unfold the nested averages to reveal a fixed weight on each slot. Once the weights are exposed, Tool #14 makes the extremes obvious — to make the total as large as possible you put the biggest numbers on the heaviest slots, and to make it smallest you do the reverse. Tool #7 (Identify Subproblems) keeps the finish clean: compute the max, compute the min, then subtract.

1STEP 1

Name the order and chain the averages

The chain of averages unfolds into weights.

m₁=(a+b)/2, m₂=(m₁+c)/2, m₃=(m₂+d)/2, m₄=(m₃+e)/2
2STEP 2

Unfold the nesting into slot weights

Each later position is twice as heavy.

m₄=a/16+b/16+c/8+d/4+e/2 = (1 · a+1 · b+2 · c+4 · d+8 · e)/16
3STEP 3

Heaviest slots get the biggest numbers

Big numbers on big weights give the largest value.

Max=(1·1+1·2+2·3+4·4+8·5)/16=(1+2+6+16+40)/16=65/16
4STEP 4

Reverse it for the smallest value

Reversing gives the smallest.

Min=(1·4+1·5+2·3+4·2+8·1)/16=(4+5+6+8+8)/16=31/16
5STEP 5

Subtract to get the gap

Subtracting gives 17/8, choice (C).

65/16-31/16=34/16=17/8 → (C)
Answer
17/8
Sanity of the weights: 1/16+1/16+2/16+4/16+8/16=16/16=1, so m₄ is a genuine weighted average and must land between 1 and 5 — both 65/16≈4.06 and 31/16≈1.94 do. The max is pulled high (near 4) because 5 sits on the heaviest slot, and the min is pulled low (near 2) because 1 does — exactly the expected directions. The gap 17/8=2.125 is comfortably less than the full spread 5-1=4, which makes sense since the two light slots dampen the extremes.
💡Key takeaway

This chained averaging is really a weighted average where the last number counts most: the slot weights are 1,1,2,4,8 over 16. Put the biggest numbers on the heaviest slots for the max (65/16), flip it for the min (31/16), and the gap is 17/8.

  • Name the order and chain the averages
  • Unfold the nesting into slot weights
  • Heaviest slots get the biggest numbers
  • Reverse it for the smallest value
  • Subtract to get the gap