AMC 10 · 2020 · #6

Grade 5 geometry-2d
line-symmetryreflection-symmetryspatial-visualizationsystematic-enumeration symmetry-argumentphysical-representationextreme-principle ↑ Prerequisites: line-symmetryreflection-symmetry
📏 Long solution 💡 3 insights 📊 Diagram
📘 View easy version →
Problem
A grid of unit squares five columns wide and four rows tall has 3 squares shaded. Shade more unit squares so the whole figure ends up with two lines of symmetry, and find the smallest number of extra squares that can do it.

Pick an answer.

(A)
4
(B)
5
(C)
6
(D)
7
(E)
8
How to solve
Strategy Draw a Diagram

Draw the grid and mark the two candidate mirror lines on it (tool #1) — the outline of the figure is a non-square rectangle, so the mirror lines are forced before any shading is chosen. Then use tool #17: mirror each shaded square across each line and see which new squares are dragged in. Tool #14 handles the word 'least' properly — first prove a lower bound (every mirror image is unavoidable), then exhibit a shading that hits exactly that bound, so the minimum is achieved and not merely approached. Tool #3 matches the count to a choice.

1STEP 1

Pin down the mirrors

The grid size fixes both mirrors.

vertical mirror: x = 5/2 (down the middle of column 3); horizontal mirror: y = 2 (between rows 2 and 3)
2STEP 2

Write the mirrors as rules

Write both as coordinate rules.

(c, r) → (6-c, r), (c, r) → (c, 5-r)
3STEP 3

Mirror the first square

The first square drags in four.

(2,4) → (4,4), (2,1), (4,1) — a family of 4 squares
4STEP 4

Mirror the second square

A square on an axis makes only two.

(3,2) → (6-3, 2) = (3,2) and (3,2) → (3, 5-2) = (3,3) — a family of 2 squares
5STEP 5

Mirror the third square

The third also drags in four.

(5,1) → (1,1), (5,4), (1,4) — a family of 4 squares; the 4+2+4 listed squares are all different
6STEP 6

Get the lower bound

Removing the three already shaded gives the bound.

4 + 2 + 4 = 10 forced squares, so at least 10 - 3 = 7 additional squares
7STEP 7

Check it is reachable

A real arrangement exists, so the answer is 7.

shade (1,1),(2,1),(4,1),(5,1),(3,2),(3,3),(1,4),(2,4),(4,4),(5,4); 10 - 3 = 7 → (D)
Answer
7
Sanity-check the final picture directly. Row 1 gets columns 1,2,4,5 shaded and row 4 gets the same four — those two rows swap under the horizontal mirror and each reads the same left-to-right as right-to-left, so both mirrors are fine there. Rows 2 and 3 each get only column 3, the middle column, which is fixed by the vertical mirror, and the two rows swap under the horizontal mirror. Total shaded is 4 + 1 + 1 + 4 = 10, so 10 - 3 = 7 extra squares. Choice (A) 4 is what you would get by mirroring only once instead of across both lines, and (E) 8 is what you get by forgetting that the middle-column square needs only one partner.
💡Key takeaway

This AMC 12 problem needs only Grade 4–5 symmetry: each shaded square drags in its mirror images — four of them if it is off both mirror lines, but only two if it sits on one — so 4 + 2 + 4 = 10 squares must be shaded and 7 still need shading.

  • Pin down where the mirrors can be
  • Write the two mirrors as rules
  • Mirror the first shaded square
  • Mirror the second shaded square
  • Mirror the third shaded square
  • Lower bound on the shading
  • Check that 7 is reachable