AMC 10 · 2021 · #7
Grade 9 algebraPick an answer.
Substituting five conditions into x(x-y)+y(y-z)+z(z-x) one at a time is five separate messes, and for a condition that survives, one substitution proves nothing — a sufficient condition has to hold for infinitely many triples. So the first move is Tool #15 (Organize Information in More Ways): expand the expression, double it, and watch it collapse into (x-y)²+(y-z)²+(z-x)². That single rewrite converts the whole problem into a statement about the gaps between the three numbers. Tool #4 (Introduce a Variable) then gives those gaps names, which exposes a hidden constraint the three of them always satisfy. Tool #2 (Make a Systematic List) finishes the theory: over the integers there is only one way for three squares to add to 2, so the set of winning triples is completely described. With that description in hand, Tool #3 (Eliminate Possibilities) turns each answer choice into a one-line gap check instead of an algebra grind.
Decide what actually has to be proved
Decide what actually has to be proved.
One bad example destroys a choice, but no number of good examples saves one.
6.EE.B.5Eliminate PossibilitiesExpand the cyclic expression
Expand the cyclic expression.
Multiplying out first strips the disguise and shows the expression is perfectly even-handed about x, y, and z.
9.A-APR.A.1Organize Information In More WaysDouble it and squares appear
Doubling reveals a sum of squares.
Doubling both sides costs nothing and turns a lopsided expression into a clean sum of squares.
Doubling both sides costs nothing and turns a lopsided expression into a clean sum of squares.
▸ Why?
Expanding the squared differences spreads the multiplication out into exactly the terms already present.
▸ Why?
A sum of squares can only be small when each square is small, which is what makes the budget so tight.
Name the three gaps
Name the three gaps.
Walking from x to y to z and back to x returns to the start, so the three gaps must cancel out.
6.EE.A.2Introduce A VariableList the only integer gap pattern
Only one gap pattern is possible.
Two is a tiny budget for integer squares — only zeros and ones can fit inside it.
8.EE.A.2Make A Systematic ListKnock out the two loose conditions
Counterexamples kill the loose conditions.
A condition that lets one gap grow without limit can never pin the total down to 1.
6.EE.A.2Eliminate PossibilitiesMeasure the gaps in the last three
What survives is two variables equal and one exactly larger by one.
Once the criterion is "two equal and one off by one", each choice is answered by looking at it, not by computing with it.
9.A-SSE.A.2Eliminate PossibilitiesWhen an expression depends only on the differences between the variables, rewrite it as a sum of squares of those differences — a small total then leaves only a handful of possible gaps, and each answer choice becomes something you read rather than compute.
- Decide what actually has to be proved
- Expand the cyclic expression
- Double it and squares appear
- Name the three gaps
- List the only integer gap pattern
- Knock out the two loose conditions
- Measure the gaps in the last three