AMC 10 · 2022 · #12

Grade 7 probabilitycounting
probability-basiccomplementary-countingfundamental-counting-principlecaseworkindependent-events complementary-countingcaseworkeasier-related-problemsystematic-enumeration ↑ Prerequisites: probability-basicfundamental-counting-principle
📏 Long solution 💡 3 insights
Problem
Four fair six-sided dice are rolled at once. Two separate demands are placed on the same four numbers: at least one must be greater than four, and at least two must be greater than two. Find the probability that both demands hold for the same roll.

Pick an answer.

(A)
$\frac{2}{3}$
(B)
$\frac{19}{27}$
(C)
$\frac{59}{81}$
(D)
$\frac{61}{81}$
(E)
$\frac{7}{9}$
How to solve
Strategy Change Focus / Count the Complement

Two "at least" conditions at once is the signature of tool #16 (Change Focus / Count the Complement): satisfying them splits into many cases, while failing them splits into very few, so counting the failures and subtracting is the short road. But tool #16 has a sharp edge on this problem and it is worth naming before starting. The failure set of condition 1 and the failure set of condition 2 are not disjoint, so the complement cannot be counted by adding those two sizes. The failures have to be re-cut into pieces that cannot both happen, and choosing that cut is the real work. Before any of that, tool #15 (Organize Information in More Ways) does the move that makes the problem small. Neither condition cares what a die actually reads, only how it sits relative to the thresholds 4 and 2, so the six faces collapse into three blocks — and, by luck of the arithmetic, each block holds exactly two faces and therefore has probability 1/3. Tool #9 (Solve an Easier Related Problem) cashes that in: because the three blocks are equally likely, the 1296 dice outcomes may be replaced by 81 equally likely three-letter patterns with no loss of exactness, and the problem becomes a counting problem small enough to check by hand. Tool #2 (Make a Systematic List) counts the first failure group directly. Tool #3 (Eliminate Possibilities) finishes the second failure group, where knowing one die is high rules out every other die being anything but low.

1STEP 1

Group each die into a band

Only three bands matter per die.

L={1,2}, M={3,4}, H={5,6}; P(L)=P(M)=P(H)=2/6=1/3
2STEP 2

Count the patterns

There are eighty-one equally likely patterns.

3⁴=81 equally likely words, each of probability (1/3)⁴=1/81; 81 × 2⁴ = 81 × 16 = 1296 = 6⁴
3STEP 3

Cut the failures apart

Split the failures so they cannot overlap.

good = 81 - #{no H} - #{at least one H and fewer than two non-L}
4STEP 4

Count the first failure group

Count the rolls with no high die.

#{no H} = 2⁴ = 16 ⟹ 16/81 = (2/3)⁴
5STEP 5

Count the second failure group

Count the rolls where the high die stands alone.

at least one H ⟹ at least one non-L; fewer than two non-L ⟹ exactly one H and three L; #{Group 2} = C(4, 1) = 4 ⟹ 4/81
6STEP 6

Subtract and read the probability

Subtracting gives sixty-one eighty-firsts.

P = (81-16-4)/81 = 61/81; 976/1296 = (61 × 16)/(81 × 16) = 61/81 (D)
Answer
61/81
The sample space is small enough to settle by brute force: sweeping all 6⁴=1296 ordered rolls and keeping those with at least one die above 4 and at least two dice above 2 leaves exactly 976, and 976/1296=61/81, confirming (D). Two bounds also fence the answer in. The event implies condition 1, whose probability is 1-(2/3)⁴=65/81, and it implies condition 2, whose probability is 72/81; the answer 61/81 ≈ 0.753 sits below both, as it must. What estimation cannot do is choose between the options: written over 81 they read (A) 54/81, (B) 57/81, (C) 59/81, (D) 61/81, (E) 63/81, all packed inside a window of width 9/81. Only an exact count decides. The double-count trap is worth pricing out. Words failing condition 1 number 16; words failing condition 2 number 9 (the single word LLLL, plus 4 positions × 2 letters =8 words with exactly one non-L). Adding those gives 25 and would yield (81-25)/81=56/81 — not among the choices, which is the tell that something was counted twice. The overlap is the 5 words that fail both, namely LLLL and the 4 words with exactly one M, and inclusion–exclusion repairs it: 16+9-5=20, matching the 16+4=20 obtained from the disjoint cut.
💡Key takeaway

Sort the six faces into three equally likely groups, then count the rolls that fail instead of the ones that work — but cut the failures so that no roll can land in two groups at once.

  • Only each die's band matters
  • Eighty-one equally likely patterns
  • Count failures, cut so they cannot overlap
  • Group 1: no high die at all
  • Group 2: the high die stands alone
  • Subtract and read the probability