AMC 10 · 2023 · #23
Grade 11 number-theorycountingPick an answer.
Listing products directly is hopeless, because the products overlap in messy ways and there are hundreds of them. The escape is to stop storing a product as a number and start storing it as three counts. Every face is built out of the primes 2, 3, and 5 only, so every product is 2^a 3^b 5^c, and unique factorization means the triple (a,b,c) is a perfect stand-in for the product. Now the trap has to be respected: the reachable triples are not the whole rectangular box of exponents, because each die can only do one job, and a die spent on a 5 is a die that is not pushing the power of 2 up. The fix is to organize the count in the right order — fix b and c first, since those two are literally headcounts of dice, and then the leftover dice make a sweep a gap-free run whose length is easy to write down. Summing those run lengths gives a cubic in n, and one factorization finishes it.
Store it as three exponents
Store the product as three exponents.
A number built only from 2s, 3s, and 5s is really just an address (a,b,c), and no two different addresses name the same number.
A number built only from a few primes is completely described by how many of each it holds.
▸ Why?
Every number has exactly one prime recipe, so the exponents are its full address.
▸ Why?
No two different addresses name the same number, so counting addresses counts the numbers.
Why the obvious count fails
A naive product double counts.
Each die has exactly one job, so the three exponents can never all be pushed to their limits at the same time.
10.S-CP.A.1Solve An Easier Related ProblemTwo exponents read straight off
Two are read straight off the roll.
The exponents of 3 and 5 are not computed from anything — they are just headcounts of which dice took which job.
9.A-CED.A.3Make A Systematic ListWhat the last exponent sweeps
The last one sweeps a gap-free run.
A die can be nudged up one power of 2 at a time, so the reachable exponents form an unbroken stretch and only its two ends need finding.
8.EE.A.1Extreme PrincipleAdd the runs over every case
Add the run lengths over every case.
The double sum collapses because the inner arithmetic list always averages out to the same clean factor n+1, no matter which case it came from.
9.A-SSE.A.2Identify SubproblemsSet the formula equal to the target
Set the formula equal to the target.
More dice can only ever add products, never remove them, so pinning down the count pins down the number of dice.
9.A-CED.A.1Convert To AlgebraFactor and read off
Factoring gives 11.
The lone prime 13 cannot hide inside a perfect square, so it must be the n+2 factor, and that single observation fixes everything.
11.A-APR.B.3Convert To AlgebraEvery dice product is really just an address (a,b,c) saying how many 2s, 3s, and 5s it holds, and the count that matters is the number of addresses the dice can actually reach — not the number of addresses that merely fit inside the box.
- Store a product as three exponents
- See why the obvious count fails
- Read b and c straight off the roll
- The power of 2 sweeps a gap-free run
- Add the runs over every case
- Set the formula equal to 936
- Factor 1872 and read off n