Competition · AMC preparation · step 4 of 4
AMC 8 · 2002 · #21
Grade 7 probabilitycountingPick an answer.
AMC 8 2002 problem © Mathematical Association of America (MAA AMC). Reproduced for educational use.
The phrase 'heads ≥ tails' on 4 tosses splits cleanly by how many heads come up. Tool #7 (Identify Subproblems) breaks the event into three disjoint cases: exactly 2, 3, or 4 heads. Tool #2 (Make a Systematic List) then counts each case by choosing which of the 4 positions are heads. Tool #16 (Count the Complement) gives a fast check: by symmetry, the events 'more heads than tails' and 'more tails than heads' are equally likely, so the only thing to subtract from 1 is the 'exactly tied' probability.
Rewrite the condition
Since heads + tails = 4, 'heads ≥ tails' becomes 'heads ≥ 2' — exactly 2, 3, or 4 heads, three non-overlapping cases.
Splitting the event into disjoint cases — 2, 3, or 4 heads — is the Grade 7 'develop a uniform probability model' move.
7.SP.C.7Identify SubproblemsCount all outcomes
Each of the 4 independent tosses is H or T, so the sample space holds 2×2×2×2 = 16 equally likely sequences.
Listing outcomes for a compound event is the Grade 7 standard for 2+ independent trials.
7.SP.C.8Make A Systematic ListCount exactly 2 heads
For exactly 2 heads, choose which 2 of the 4 positions are heads (1,2 / 1,3 / 1,4 / 2,3 / 2,4 / 3,4): C(4,2) = 6 sequences.
Choosing 2 positions out of 4 to be heads is the same kind of organized list that powers Grade 7 compound-event counts.
A four-toss result shows exactly two heads in exactly C(4, 2)=6 different ways.
▸ Why?
Saying which two of the four tosses land heads fixes the whole result, because the other two tosses are then forced to be tails; so counting the two-head results is the same job as counting the ways to pick two tosses out of the four.
▸ Why?
Each two-head result is matched to one choice of two head-positions, and each choice of two positions is matched back to one result, so the two collections are paired off item for item.
▸ Why?
The ways to pick two of the four tosses can be written out in full — {1,2}, {1,3}, {1,4}, {2,3}, {2,4}, {3,4} — with no pair left out and none repeated.
▸ Why?
Tagging each listed pair with one counting number, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and running out of pairs and numbers together shows the finished list holds exactly six pairs.
Count 3 and 4 heads
For 3 heads, pick the single tail position: C(4,3) = 4 (THHH, HTHH, HHTH, HHHT). For 4 heads, only HHHH: C(4,4) = 1.
Same listing rule applied to the other two cases — pick where the tails go.
7.SP.C.8Make A Systematic ListAdd and divide
The disjoint cases give 6 + 4 + 1 = 11 favorable outcomes out of 16 equally likely sequences.
Probability = favorable outcomes ÷ total equally likely outcomes — the Grade 7 uniform-model formula.
7.SP.C.7Make A Systematic ListSort the 16 outcome sequences by how many heads showed up. The 'heads at least tails' event is C(4, 2) + C(4, 3) + C(4, 4) = 11 out of 16 — a Grade 7 organized-list count.
- Rewrite the condition
- Count all outcomes
- Count exactly 2 heads
- Count 3 and 4 heads
- Add and divide
A parent dashboard for the family lives at sensimlab.com.