Competition · AMC preparation · step 4 of 4
AMC 8 · 2015 · #20
Grade 6 algebraarithmeticPick an answer.
AMC 8 2015 problem © Mathematical Association of America (MAA AMC). Reproduced for educational use.
There are only three sock prices and a small total of 12 pairs, so the candidate sets are tiny. Tool #2 (Systematic List) lets us try each possible number of 3 and 1 counts. Tool #9 (Easier Related Problem) gives us a shortcut: pretend all 12 pairs cost1 — that's only 12 of "extra cost" by swapping some 1 pairs for pricier ones. Tool #3 (Eliminate Possibilities) is a safety net: with answer choices A–E giving the1 count, we can check each candidate against the constraints if needed.
Find the extra dollars needed
If all 12 pairs were $1 the bill is $12, but it's $24 — so the pricier socks add $12 of extra cost.
Comparing a 'pretend all-$1' world to the real total is the Tool #9 move: replace the messy three-price problem with one we can total in our head.
3.OA.A.3Solve An Easier Related ProblemWrite each pair's extra cost
A $3 pair adds $2 over baseline, a $4 pair adds $3; with y, z their counts, the extra cost is 2y + 3z = 12.
One equation in two unknowns instead of two equations in three unknowns — a Grade 4 multi-step word-problem reduction.
4.OA.A.3Solve An Easier Related ProblemList every possible pair of counts
Test z = 1, 2, 3, … in 2y + 3z = 12, keeping only positive whole y: only z = 2, y = 3 works.
Ordering by z guarantees we don't miss or double-count cases — that's the whole point of Tool #2.
The only way the pricier pairs add exactly 12 of extra cost, using at least one 3 pair and at least one 4 pair, is three 3 pairs together with two $4 pairs.
▸ Why?
Each 3 pair adds 2 of extra and each 4 pair adds 3 of extra, and together those two amounts must fill the whole 12 of extra, so the counts satisfy 2y + 3z = 12.
▸ Why?
The 12 of extra has no other source than the 3 pairs' share plus the 4 pairs' share, so those two shares add back to the full 12.
▸ Why?
A 4 pair sits 3 above the 1 baseline, and z such pairs each add that same fixed 3, so together they contribute z groups of $3.
▸ Why?
Once you fix how many 4 pairs z there are, the number of 3 pairs is forced to y = (12 - 3z) / 2, the only value that keeps the extra at $12.
▸ Why?
Reading y back out of 2y = 12 - 3z means undoing the doubling by halving, which leaves exactly one y.
▸ Why?
So only z = 1, 2, 3, 4 are worth testing, and of these only z = 2 leaves a whole number of 3 pairs that is at least one, namely y = 3.
▸ Why?
z counts real pairs, so it is a whole number of at least 1, and its share 3z is only part of the 12 of extra, so it cannot exceed 12 and z can be at most 4.
▸ Why?
For z = 1 and z = 3 the forced y comes out as a half, which cannot count actual pairs, and for z = 4 it comes out as 0, which breaks the 'at least one 3 pair' rule, so only z = 2 survives.
Find the cheapest count
With y = 3 and z = 2, the pair-count total x + y + z = 12 gives x = 12 - 3 - 2 = 7.
Once two of the three counts are pinned down, the third is just a subtraction from the known total of 12 pairs.
3.OA.A.3Make A Systematic ListCheck the count and the cost
Check the original: 7 + 3 + 2 = 12 pairs and 7×$1 + 3×$3 + 2×$4 = $24, each price used — matches (D).
Plugging the answer back into the words of the problem is the Tool #3 check — it catches any mis-set-up before we commit.
4.OA.A.3Eliminate PossibilitiesThis AMC 8 problem fits in your toolkit: a Grade 6 word-problem-to-equation step plus a tiny systematic list of cases is all it takes to find the answer.
- Find the extra dollars needed
- Write each pair's extra cost
- List every possible pair of counts
- Find the cheapest count
- Check the count and the cost
A parent dashboard for the family lives at sensimlab.com.