AMC 10 · 2008 · #9
Grade 7 number-theoryPick an answer.
AMC 10 2008 problem © Mathematical Association of America (MAA AMC). Reproduced for educational use.
The messy-looking expression hides a much simpler one. Split the task into two smaller problems: first simplify 2x/3-x/6 to a single fraction, then ask what that fraction being an integer demands of x. Once the demand is clear, test a value to see which extra properties are NOT forced, and eliminate the choices that claim too much.
Combine into one fraction
Over the common denominator 6, , so the difference is , which reduces to .
Rewriting a complicated expression in its simplest form often reveals the real question underneath.
7.EE.A.1Identify SubproblemsTranslate the integer condition
So the given condition just says is a whole number, which happens exactly when 2 divides x.
A fraction over 2 lands on a whole number only when the top is a multiple of 2.
4.OA.B.4Identify SubproblemsTest what is not forced
Test x=2: is an integer, yet 2 is positive and is not a multiple of 3.
One well-chosen example can prove that a claimed rule is not actually required.
One well-chosen example proves that a claimed rule is not actually required.
▸ Why?
A single case where the claim fails is enough to knock the claim down.
▸ Why?
The condition only forces the top to be even, which says nothing further about the number itself.
Eliminate and conclude
That one example kills negative, multiple of 3, multiple of 6, and multiple of 12, so only even survives — choice (B).
When one property survives every test and the stronger ones do not, that surviving property is the answer.
4.OA.B.4Eliminate PossibilitiesSimplify the messy expression first: 2x/3 - x/6 is really just x/2, so x only has to be even.
- Combine into one fraction
- Translate the integer condition
- Test what is not forced
- Eliminate and conclude