AMC 10 · 2002 · #2

Grade 5 arithmetic
order-of-operationslinear-equations-one-var work-backwards ↑ Prerequisites: order-of-operations
📏 Medium solution 💡 2 insights
📘 View easy version →
Problem
The correct instructions were: take a certain number, subtract 3, then divide by 9. Cindy did the wrong operations instead — she subtracted 9 and then divided by 3 — and got 43. Find what she would have gotten if she had followed the correct instructions.

Pick an answer.

(A)
15
(B)
34
(C)
43
(D)
51
(E)
138
How to solve
Strategy Work Backwards

The correct answer depends on the original number, which is hidden — but we are handed the END of Cindy's wrong procedure (the result 43). Tool #11 (Work Backwards) is built for exactly this: run her two operations in reverse, undoing each with its opposite, to recover the starting number. Tool #7 (Identify Subproblems) then makes the job two clean stages: first recover the number, then feed that number through the correct procedure. The tempting trap is to answer 138 (choice E), which is only the original number — not the corrected result the question actually asks for.

1STEP 1

Recover the original number

Undo her steps backwards: multiply to reverse the division, 43 × 3 = 129, then add 9 to get 138.

43 × 3 = 129, 129 + 9 = 138
2STEP 2

Apply the correct procedure

Now run 138 through the intended recipe: 138 - 3 = 135, then 135 ÷ 9 = 15.

138 - 3 = 135, 135 ÷ 9 = 15
3STEP 3

Match to a choice

The result 15 is choice (A); 138 and 43 sit in the list to catch stopping early.

15 = (A)
Answer
15
Check the recovered number forward through Cindy's wrong steps: 138 - 9 = 129, and 129 ÷ 3 = 43 — exactly her stated result, so 138 is correct. Then the correct steps give (138 - 3) ÷ 9 = 135 ÷ 9 = 15, and 135 divides evenly by 9, as clean whole-number arithmetic should. The corrected answer 15 is much smaller than the wrong answer 43, which makes sense: the correct procedure divides by the larger divisor 9 instead of 3.
💡Key takeaway

When you know the end result, undo each step with its opposite to get back to the start — then read the question again to answer what it truly asks.

  • Recover the original number
  • Apply the correct procedure
  • Match to a choice