AMC 10 · 2011 · #3

Grade 5 arithmetic
multi-digit-arithmeticestimationmultiples bound-inequality-then-enumerate ↑ Prerequisites: multi-digit-arithmetic
📏 Medium solution 💡 1 insight
📘 View easy version →
Problem
Small containers must together fill one large container completely. Find the fewest needed.

Pick an answer.

(A)
11
(B)
12
(C)
13
(D)
14
(E)
15
How to solve
Strategy Extreme Principle

The question asks for the MINIMUM number of bottles, and the whole trap lives at the boundary: dividing 500 by 35 gives about 14.3, which sits between two answer choices. Tool #14 (Extreme Principle) is exactly the min/max lens — we look for the smallest whole number of bottles that first pushes the total to 500 ml or more. Tool #8 (Analyze the Units) keeps the bookkeeping honest: each bottle adds 35 ml, so n bottles give 35n ml, and we compare that to 500 ml. Tool #6 (Guess and Check) then confirms the boundary by testing the two neighboring counts, 14 and 15.

1STEP 1

Write the demand as an inequality

The demand is one plain inequality.

35 × n ≥ 500
2STEP 2

Look at the remainder

Dividing leaves a nonzero remainder.

500 ÷ 35 = 14 remainder 10, since 500 = 35 × 14 + 10
3STEP 3

Why it must round up

So the count must round up.

14 bottles → 490 ml < 500 ml, so round up to 15 bottles
4STEP 4

Check the neighbours

Checking neighbours gives 15, choice (E).

14 × 35 = 490 < 500, 15 × 35 = 525 ≥ 500 → (E) 15
Answer
15
Estimate: 500 ÷ 35 ≈ 14.3, so the answer must be just above 14. The choices (D) 14 and (E) 15 are the two candidates, and 14 is the trap for anyone who rounds down. Since 14 bottles give 490 ml — 10 ml short — the bottle would not be full, so 15 is the smallest count that works. That matches (E).
💡Key takeaway

When a real-world division has a leftover, round UP — 14 bottles fall 10 ml short, so you need a 15th to truly fill the big bottle.