Competition · AMC preparation · step 4 of 4
AMC 8 · 2025 · #15
Grade 6 countingalgebra
Pick an answer.
AMC 8 2025 problem © Mathematical Association of America (MAA AMC). Reproduced for educational use.
Counting silver tiles two ways links P_SS, P_SG, P_GG by two clean equations, and subtracting them gives the magic identity P_GG = P_SS + 5 (Tool #13). That single identity converts the original 'GG min/max' question into a 'SS min/max' question — Tool #16, count the complement — because gold-on-gold is hard to picture but silver-on-silver is a small, manageable count. Finally, Tool #7 splits the work into two parallel subproblems: find P_SS,min and P_SS,max independently, then convert each back to P_GG.
Write the two equations
Name the pair counts P_SS, P_SG, P_GG. Total pairs give one equation; counting silvers (2 per SS, 1 per SG) gives 2P_SS + P_SG = 13.
Letting variables stand for unknown counts is exactly Grade 6 'use variables to write expressions for a problem'.
6.EE.B.6Convert To AlgebraSubtract the equations
Subtract the silver equation from the pair-total equation. P_SG cancels, leaving the tidy identity P_GG = P_SS + 5.
Combining and simplifying two equivalent expressions to expose a hidden relationship is Grade 6 expression manipulation.
However Kei colors the grid, the number of gold-on-gold pairs is always exactly five more than the number of silver-on-silver pairs.
▸ Why?
The relation drops out of counting the same grid two ways — once by pairs and once by silver squares — and then combining the two counts with basic algebra.
▸ Why?
The 18 overlapping pairs sort into the three types SS, SG, and GG with none skipped and none counted twice, so P_SS + P_SG + P_GG = 18.
▸ Why?
Sorting the 13 silver squares by the pair each one sits in gives 2 from every SS pair and 1 from every SG pair with none left over, so 2P_SS + P_SG = 13.
▸ Why?
Using the silver count to replace P_SG inside the pair total, then tidying the terms, turns the two equations into P_GG = P_SS + 5.
▸ Why?
The silver count 2P_SS + P_SG = 13 rearranges to P_SG = 13 - 2P_SS, since subtracting undoes the added 2P_SS.
▸ Why?
That expression is equal to P_SG, so it may stand in P_SG's place inside the pair total without changing what is true.
▸ Why?
Collecting the like terms P_SS - 2P_SS into -P_SS and setting the constants apart leaves the fixed gap 18 - 13 = 5.
Restate the goal
Since P_GG = P_SS + 5 always, optimizing P_GG means optimizing P_SS — and silvers are scarce, so SS pairs are far easier to count.
Two expressions that always differ by 5 are 'equivalent' for optimization purposes — minimize one, you minimize the other.
6.EE.A.4Change Focus Count The ComplementFind the largest case
Subproblem 1 (M): pack silvers into SS pairs. 13 silvers make at most ⌊⌋ = 6 SS pairs (1 silver left over), so M = 6 + 5 = 11.
Splitting 13 into pairs with 1 left over is exactly Grade 4 'quotient and remainder' thinking.
4.NBT.B.6Identify SubproblemsFind the smallest case
Subproblem 2 (m): spread silvers so none overlap. With 18 slots and only 13 silvers, P_SS = 0 is easy, so m = 0 + 5 = 5.
Checking that P_SS = 0 satisfies every constraint is Grade 6 'find values that make the equation true'.
6.EE.B.5Identify SubproblemsAdd the two extremes
Add the extremes: m + M = 5 + 11 = 16, which is choice (C).
The final assembly is a single Grade 4 multi-step word-problem sum.
4.OA.A.3Convert To AlgebraThis AMC 8 problem only needs Grade 6 variable-and-equation skills — name the unknowns, subtract two count equations, and the answer pops out!
- Write the two equations
- Subtract the equations
- Restate the goal
- Find the largest case
- Find the smallest case
- Add the two extremes
A parent dashboard for the family lives at sensimlab.com.